Transparency
Data sources and attribution
RosterVerdict uses reliable and legally usable information, creates its own derived analysis, and keeps source limitations visible.
How we collect information
RosterVerdict primarily researches, verifies, and enters football information manually from publicly available sources. We do not build our database by scraping or copying websites.
Publicly available facts are used as inputs to our own analysis. Where possible, we check important information across more than one source, respect usage rights, and provide attribution when it is required. We do not republish protected articles, proprietary grades, images, or restricted datasets as our own content.
Source principles
- Use reliable information that can be used responsibly in a public product.
- Attribute external data where required and distinguish it from RosterVerdict analysis.
- Review conflicting or incomplete information rather than presenting it as settled fact.
- Use licensed information where restricted data is important to the product.
Our own analysis
RosterVerdict combines source facts with its own football framework to create player values, roster comparisons, position-room views, and team verdicts.
An external fact used as an input is not presented as an external source’s endorsement of our conclusion.
Rights and boundaries
Information being visible online does not automatically make it free to copy or republish. RosterVerdict does not present protected third-party grades, media, or restricted data as its own.